Quatrième partie · À la poursuite des suturesChapitre 18
Exceptionnel veut dire relevable
Exceptional means liftable
établiRead from the draft of 3 October 2026
When is the geometry of a finite simple group over a finite field the shadow of a lattice in characteristic zero, and why does the answer fall at the exceptional isomorphisms?
The type law sees a life only if the life’s natural module is a residue: the reduction at a prime of a lattice over the integers of a number field, with a character the Galois group moves. Some lives the drafts computed are seen, through Klein’s lattice, the icosians, Valentiner’s lattice and over ; others are not, and the first question is why.
In dimension at most four the answer was proved first. A residue forces the group onto the short lists of primitive collineation groups of Klein and Blichfeldt, and for the projective line over this allows exactly , the values at which has an exceptional isomorphism. The drafts have since removed the bound on the dimension: with the lower bounds for the degrees of projective representations in place of the lists, the lives that lift form a finite list, and among the groups with lives in two characteristics every one but has both lives as reductions of one lattice.
So the exceptional isomorphisms of finite group theory are read as the places where the degree bound gives way. The theorem stands; what remains is around it: rows of the list that rest on cited constructions, the type law on the new rows, and a search of the literature.
The finite simple groups with lives in two different characteristics are , , , , and .
(1) Residue lives in both characteristics occur exactly for , , and . A single lattice has both as residues exactly for (the icosians at 2 and ), (Klein’s lattice at and ) and (the Witting lattice at 2 and ). For the residue lives are the conic at 3 (Valentiner’s lattice) and at 2 (); no lattice has both, since they have dimensions 3 and 4.
(2) If quaternionic residues are admitted, all of the groups except have lifted lives in both characteristics, and in each case one lattice carries both: over the maximal order of the quaternion algebra for , with at 2 and at 3; over the same order for , with at 2 and at 3.
(3) The life of in characteristic 2 lifts in none of the three senses. It occurs only as a composition factor, , of the seven-dimensional lattice of the Ree life reduced modulo 2.
From the classification of the lives that lift, below. For (3): the least degree of a nontrivial projective representation of is 7, which exceeds and .
Status
The prototype in dimension at most four is proved from Klein’s and Blichfeldt’s lists, and the projective line over is settled by it. The classification in every dimension is proved in the drafts modulo the classification results it cites: Tiep’s lower bounds for cross-characteristic degrees, the tables of Hiss and Malle, Guralnick and Hoffman’s bound on first cohomology, and Lübeck’s tables of small representations; the theorem on two characteristics follows from it. Most rows of the list are realized by lattices computed in the drafts; the Tits row and the two quaternionic rows of characteristic 2 rest on cited constructions and observations.
The theorem is established; what remains is around it. The Tits group’s lattice of rank 26 over is not built, and whether its outer automorphism exchanges the two characters of degree 26 is suggested by the ATLAS listings, not decided. The rank-5 lattice over the Hurwitz order for is shown to exist, not identified. The type law has not been run on the new rows. And each reduction is classical, but the complete list, in its three senses, was not found in the sources searched; it needs a literature check before it is called new.
Quand la loi est aveugleWhen the law is blind
A lift of a life’s module would be a complex representation of the module’s dimension, of the group or of a cover, whose character the Galois group moves. So the failures can be checked against the complex characters: either there is no representation of that dimension at all, or the ones there are cannot be moved.
For and no complex irreducible has the module’s dimension, and their Schur multipliers are trivial, so no cover helps; for neither the group nor its double cover has a representation of dimension 4. For and lifts exist, but they are rational: the one character of degree 6 of is invariant under every automorphism, and the two faithful characters of degree 4 of are exchanged by the outer automorphisms the law would have to realize.
In each of the following, the natural module of the life is the good reduction of no -lattice whose character is moved by the Galois group, for any cover of .
(1) at 2, dimension 2: the complex irreducible degrees are 1,7,7,7,7,8,9,9,9, and the Schur multiplier is trivial. (2) at 3, dimension 3: the degrees are 1,6,7,7,7,14,21,21,21,27,28,28,32,32, and the multiplier is trivial. (3) at 2, dimension 6: the only character of degree 6 is rational, with Frobenius–Schur indicator , and invariant under . (4) at 2, dimension 4: the only lifts of degree 4 are the two faithful characters of , rational with indicator , whose reductions are the two natural modules; fixes each, while and exchange them. (5) at 2, dimension 4: and have no complex representation of dimension 4.
(1)–(4) by direct computation, by Burnside’s algorithm validated by both orthogonality relations, with the multipliers from the ATLAS. (5) From the ATLAS, which lists 8 as the least faithful degree of .
La portée de la loiThe reach of the law
The exceptions have a common cause, and in small dimension it decides almost everything. A lattice with residue gives a projective representation of in . It is faithful, because an element acting by a scalar acts by a scalar on the residue, and irreducible, because the residue is. A system of imprimitivity with blocks would give a homomorphism with ; is solvable and is simple and non-abelian, so the map is trivial and the representation reducible. The image is therefore primitive, and the primitive finite subgroups of for are on Klein’s list for and Blichfeldt’s for .
Let be a finite non-abelian simple group and a faithful, absolutely irreducible projective representation of of dimension over a finite field: the natural module of a life, say, or the conic module of for odd.
(1) If is a residue of a lattice over the integers of a number field, then is isomorphic to a primitive finite subgroup of : for to ; for to , or ; for to , , , or .
(2) Let be such a residue, with character , and an automorphism of . Then is realized at by a nontrivial Galois element, as in the type law, if and only if for some lift is a Galois conjugate of different from . If , then is realized by a linear map at every prime where the reduction is absolutely irreducible. If every lift is rational and moved by , no Galois element realizes at .
(1) is the argument above. (2) The type law needs , and such a exists exactly when lies in the Galois orbit of ; a rational character is fixed by every Galois element, so it can realize only an that fixes it. If , then , and at a prime of absolutely irreducible reduction any two stable lattices are homothetic, so the intertwiner can be scaled to an automorphism of the local lattice, whose reduction realizes linearly.
Les exceptions expliquéesThe exceptions explained
So a life is blind to the law in one of two ways. Either its group is too large to act projectively in its module’s dimension in characteristic zero: , of order 504, in dimension 2; , of order 6048, in dimension 3; , of order 20160, in dimension 4. Or its lifts are rational, so the outer automorphism exchanges characters that no Galois element moves: as , and as .
The lives the law sees are the remaining kind, lifts on the lists whose characters the Galois group moves, and each comes with its lattice: the icosians, Klein’s lattice, Valentiner’s lattice and over .
(1) The life of on (dimension 2), the life of on its hermitian plane over (dimension 3), and the life of as (dimension 4) are residues of no lattice: their groups are not on the lists. (2) The life of as (dimension 4) is a residue, since is on the list for , but its lifts are the rational 4-dimensional characters of , which the outer automorphism exchanges, so no Galois element realizes it there.
(3) The life of as (dimension 6) has only the rational, invariant lift ; the outer automorphism is realized there by a linear map, through the full group , and by no Galois element. (4) The lives the law sees, those of , , through Valentiner’s lattice and , are exactly the lifts on the lists whose characters the Galois group moves.
La droite sur The line over a finite field
The projective line is the first test. Its natural module has dimension 2 and, for odd, its conic module dimension 3, so a residue would make isomorphic to , or , and the orders decide. The values left are those of the exceptional isomorphisms, and at each of them the lattice exists: the icosians for , Klein’s lattice for , Valentiner’s for .
For , the life of on is a residue, through its natural module or, for odd, its conic module, only if . These are exactly the for which has an exceptional isomorphism: , , . For these four values the lattices exist: the icosians, Klein’s lattice and Valentiner’s.
By the reach of the law, would be isomorphic to , or . The orders equal 60, 168 and 360 only for , and .
Résidus, résidus quaternioniques, cœursResidues, quaternionic residues, hearts
To remove the bound on the dimension the drafts widen both sides. A life is now an isomorphism of with for any classical or exceptional group on its natural module: , the conic module of , , , the orthogonal groups, and the exceptional groups on their minimal modules, from in dimension 7 (or 6 in characteristic 2) to in dimension 248. And a lift may be of three kinds: a residue as before; a quaternionic residue, the reduction of a lattice over a maximal order of a quaternion algebra at a prime where the algebra ramifies; or a heart, a reduction whose composition factors are the natural module once and the trivial module times.
Each kind gives a degree bound. Write for the least degree of a nontrivial irreducible projective complex representation of . A residue needs , a quaternionic residue a character of degree exactly , and a heart has , by the bound of Guralnick and Hoffman, so that . The least degree grows exponentially in the rank (Landazuri, Seitz and Zalesskii) while grows linearly, so only finitely many lives can lift. Kneser’s family shows the senses side by side: a root lattice modulo a prime is a residue where its form stays nondegenerate and a heart with one trivial factor where it acquires a radical.
(1) If is a residue, then . (2) If is a quaternionic residue, then has an irreducible character of degree exactly with local Schur index 2 at a prime over ; in particular . (3) If is a heart with trivial factors, then acts trivially on , , and .
(1) and (2): a residue is the reduction of a character with , of degree ; a quaternionic one, of a character of degree with Schur index 2 at ; neither is trivial on . (3) Over the completion, take a lattice generated by one vector of the image of an idempotent belonging to ; its reduction has simple head and, by Brauer–Nesbitt, a radical of trivial factors, which is since is perfect. The extension classes are linearly independent in , and Guralnick and Hoffman bound that by .
Les vies qui se relèventThe lives that lift
The candidates are found by comparing the degree bounds with over every family, using Tiep’s lower bounds for the degrees of cross-characteristic representations and, for the groups with lives in two characteristics, the exact degrees in the tables of Hiss and Malle. No life of dimension above 26 survives. Each survivor is then realized or excluded: the residues by lattices, the root lattices among them by Kneser’s method, the Coxeter–Todd lattice modulo by direct computation, and the Tits group by Tiep and Zalesskii’s observation that its two characters of degree 26 stay irreducible modulo 2.
The lattices are familiar ones: root lattices, the Witting lattice, , Klein’s and Valentiner’s lattices, the icosians, and, for one quaternionic row, the Leech lattice as a lattice over the Hurwitz order. Three reductions are close to the list but are not lives, because their images are proper subgroups: , and .
(1) The natural modules that are residues are exactly 17: , and the conic for ; the conic and for ; the conic and for ; for ; , , and for ; for ; for ; for ; ; and , the Tits group, in dimension 26.
(2) The natural modules that are quaternionic residues but not residues are exactly 4: , , and . (3) The natural modules that are hearts but not residues are exactly 3, each with : for , , and for . In every case , and only for the Tits group.
Deux caractéristiques, un réseauTwo characteristics, one lattice
The exceptional isomorphisms across characteristics are the six groups of the theorem, and the list of lifts sorts them. For , and one lattice has both lives as residues, at two primes: the double life is two reductions of one object in characteristic zero. For and the same holds once quaternionic residues are admitted, through and over the maximal order of the quaternion algebra ramified at 3 and . The coincidence is not of this kind on the four-dimensional side: that module lifts in no sense, and reaches it only through the Klein correspondence , as the heart .
is the one exception. Its life at 3 lifts, as the seven-dimensional Ree lattice, but its life at 2 lifts in no sense: the least degree of a nontrivial projective representation, 7, is too large for a module of dimension 2, and the Ree lattice modulo 2 has it only as a composition factor.
Root lattices modulo a prime realize the classical coincidences of symmetric and Weyl groups in all three senses: is the natural module of ; modulo 5 has the conic of as heart; modulo 2 and modulo 3 has those of and as hearts; modulo 2 has that of ; is that of , and modulo 3 has that of as heart; modulo 2 has that of ; is that of . In each heart the radical of the form is a trivial submodule without an invariant complement.
Ce qui reste à bâtirWhat remains to be built
The type law sees a row exactly when its lift is moved by Galois. Of the residues, rows with Galois-moved lifts include the new ones of the Witting lattice, and the Tits group; rows with rational lifts fixed by the outer automorphisms in question realize them linearly; and keeps its rational lifts exchanged, which no Galois element realizes. At complex conjugation is ramified at and swaps and , so the outer automorphism of is realized by a linear map, acting through ; the row of is of the same ramified type. For the Tits group the same holds at if its outer automorphism exchanges and , which the ATLAS listings suggest and nothing in the drafts decides.
The next computations the drafts list: the two quaternionic rows of characteristic 2 computed rather than cited, the Leech lattice over the Hurwitz order modulo for and the rank-5 lattice for ; the Tits lattice over and the action of its outer automorphism; the type law on the new rows; and a seam reading of the exception , residue against composition factor. Each reduction on the list is classical, but the complete list in its three senses was not found in the sources searched.
By the reach of the law, the type law realizes an outer automorphism at a residue exactly when its lift is moved by Galois. Rows with Galois-moved lifts: , and the conic for ; the conic and for ; the conic for ; , and for ; ; the Ree group ; and the Tits group. Rows with rational lifts fixed by the outer automorphisms in question, realized linearly: , , and , triality on the last changing the cover. The row has rational lifts exchanged by the outer automorphism, which no Galois element realizes.
What is held: the prototype in dimension at most four, the five early exceptions explained, the projective line over settled, and the classification in every dimension, proved modulo the classification results it cites, with its consequence that every exceptional isomorphism across characteristics except is two reductions of one lattice.
What would finish the work around the theorem: the rows that rest on cited constructions built, the Tits row’s outer automorphism decided, the type law run on the new rows, and a search of the literature that finds the list or confirms it is new. Beside it stand the other chantiers, which ask questions about the whole network of incarnations at once: whether every natural identification comes from the arithmetic source (chapter 16), and whether a group’s order is the product of its local lives (chapter 19).