Universal Kernel

Quatrième partie · À la poursuite des suturesChapitre 18

Exceptionnel veut dire relevable

Exceptional means liftable

établiRead from the draft of 3 October 2026

PSL(2,8)at 2, dimension 2U3(3)at 3, dimension 3G2(2)'at 2, dimension 6Sp4(2)' = A6at 2, dimension 4two faithful characters of 2·A6 of degree 4, rationalPSL(4,2) = A8at 2, dimension 4no degree 4 for A8 or 2·A8151015202530degree
Plate 18.1The five blind lives: for each, the complex irreducible degrees (ticks) against the module’s dimension (gold ring). Where the ring is empty no lift exists; where a blue tick sits on it, the lift exists but is rational.
  1. 18.1
  2. 18.2
  3. 18.3
  4. 18.4
  5. 18.5
  6. 18.6
  7. 18.7
  8. 18.8

When is the geometry of a finite simple group over a finite field the shadow of a lattice in characteristic zero, and why does the answer fall at the exceptional isomorphisms?

The type law sees a life only if the life’s natural module is a residue: the reduction at a prime of a lattice over the integers of a number field, with a character the Galois group moves. Some lives the drafts computed are seen, through Klein’s lattice, the icosians, Valentiner’s lattice and E8E_8 over Z[ω]\Z[\omega]; others are not, and the first question is why.

In dimension at most four the answer was proved first. A residue forces the group onto the short lists of primitive collineation groups of Klein and Blichfeldt, and for the projective line over Fq\F_q this allows exactly q=4,5,7,9q=4,5,7,9, the values at which PSL⁡(2,q)\PSL(2,q) has an exceptional isomorphism. The drafts have since removed the bound on the dimension: with the lower bounds for the degrees of projective representations in place of the lists, the lives that lift form a finite list, and among the groups with lives in two characteristics every one but PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8) has both lives as reductions of one lattice.

So the exceptional isomorphisms of finite group theory are read as the places where the degree bound gives way. The theorem stands; what remains is around it: rows of the list that rest on cited constructions, the type law on the new rows, and a search of the literature.

The central result · Exceptional means liftable, with one exception

The finite simple groups with lives in two different characteristics are A5A_5, PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), A6A_6, U4(2)\mathrm U_4(2), U3(3)≅G2(2)′\mathrm U_3(3)\cong G_2(2)' and PSL⁡(2,8)≅2G2(3)′\PSL(2,8)\cong{}^2G_2(3)'.

(1) Residue lives in both characteristics occur exactly for A5A_5, PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), A6A_6 and U4(2)\mathrm U_4(2). A single lattice has both as residues exactly for A5A_5 (the icosians at 2 and 5\sqrt5), PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) (Klein’s lattice at αˉ\bar\alpha and −7\sqrt{-7}) and U4(2)\mathrm U_4(2) (the Witting lattice at 2 and −3\sqrt{-3}). For A6A_6 the residue lives are the conic at 3 (Valentiner’s lattice) and Sp(4,2)′\mathrm{Sp}(4,2)' at 2 (E8E_8); no lattice has both, since they have dimensions 3 and 4.

(2) If quaternionic residues are admitted, all of the groups except PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8) have lifted lives in both characteristics, and in each case one lattice carries both: E8E_8 over the maximal order of the quaternion algebra D3,∞D_{3,\infty} for A6A_6, with Sp(4,2)′\mathrm{Sp}(4,2)' at 2 and SL⁡(2,9)\SL(2,9) at 3; K12K_{12} over the same order for U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3), with G2(2)′G_2(2)' at 2 and SU(3,3)\mathrm{SU}(3,3) at 3.

(3) The life of PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8) in characteristic 2 lifts in none of the three senses. It occurs only as a composition factor, 1+2+41+2+4, of the seven-dimensional lattice of the Ree life reduced modulo 2.

Proof

From the classification of the lives that lift, below. For (3): the least degree of a nontrivial projective representation of PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8) is 7, which exceeds 2n=42n=4 and 32n=3\tfrac32n=3.

Status

The prototype in dimension at most four is proved from Klein’s and Blichfeldt’s lists, and the projective line over Fq\F_q is settled by it. The classification in every dimension is proved in the drafts modulo the classification results it cites: Tiep’s lower bounds for cross-characteristic degrees, the tables of Hiss and Malle, Guralnick and Hoffman’s bound on first cohomology, and Lübeck’s tables of small representations; the theorem on two characteristics follows from it. Most rows of the list are realized by lattices computed in the drafts; the Tits row and the two quaternionic rows of characteristic 2 rest on cited constructions and observations.

The theorem is established; what remains is around it. The Tits group’s lattice of rank 26 over Z[−2]\Z[\sqrt{-2}] is not built, and whether its outer automorphism exchanges the two characters of degree 26 is suggested by the ATLAS listings, not decided. The rank-5 lattice over the Hurwitz order for U5(2)\mathrm U_5(2) is shown to exist, not identified. The type law has not been run on the new rows. And each reduction is classical, but the complete list, in its three senses, was not found in the sources searched; it needs a literature check before it is called new.

Quand la loi est aveugleWhen the law is blind

PSL(2,8)at 2, dimension 2U3(3)at 3, dimension 3G2(2)'at 2, dimension 6Sp4(2)' = A6at 2, dimension 4two faithful characters of 2·A6 of degree 4, rationalPSL(4,2) = A8at 2, dimension 4no degree 4 for A8 or 2·A8151015202530degree
Plate 18.1The five blind lives: for each, the complex irreducible degrees (ticks) against the module’s dimension (gold ring). Where the ring is empty no lift exists; where a blue tick sits on it, the lift exists but is rational.

A lift of a life’s module would be a complex representation of the module’s dimension, of the group or of a cover, whose character the Galois group moves. So the failures can be checked against the complex characters: either there is no representation of that dimension at all, or the ones there are cannot be moved.

For PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8) and U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3) no complex irreducible has the module’s dimension, and their Schur multipliers are trivial, so no cover helps; for A8A_8 neither the group nor its double cover has a representation of dimension 4. For G2(2)′G_2(2)' and Sp4(2)′=A6\mathrm{Sp}_4(2)'=A_6 lifts exist, but they are rational: the one character of degree 6 of G2(2)′G_2(2)' is invariant under every automorphism, and the two faithful characters of degree 4 of 2⋅A62{\cdot}A_6 are exchanged by the outer automorphisms the law would have to realize.

Proposition(Lives that are no residue) computed

In each of the following, the natural module of the life is the good reduction of no GG-lattice whose character is moved by the Galois group, for any cover of GG.

(1) PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8) at 2, dimension 2: the complex irreducible degrees are 1,7,7,7,7,8,9,9,9, and the Schur multiplier is trivial. (2) U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3) at 3, dimension 3: the degrees are 1,6,7,7,7,14,21,21,21,27,28,28,32,32, and the multiplier is trivial. (3) G2(2)′G_2(2)' at 2, dimension 6: the only character of degree 6 is rational, with Frobenius–Schur indicator −1-1, and invariant under Aut⁡(G)\Aut(G). (4) Sp4(2)′=A6\mathrm{Sp}_4(2)'=A_6 at 2, dimension 4: the only lifts of degree 4 are the two faithful characters of 2⋅A62{\cdot}A_6, rational with indicator −1-1, whose reductions are the two natural modules; S6S_6 fixes each, while PGL⁡(2,9)\PGL(2,9) and M10M_{10} exchange them. (5) PSL⁡(4,2)=A8\PSL(4,2)=A_8 at 2, dimension 4: A8A_8 and 2⋅A82{\cdot}A_8 have no complex representation of dimension 4.

Proof

(1)–(4) by direct computation, by Burnside’s algorithm validated by both orthogonality relations, with the multipliers from the ATLAS. (5) From the ATLAS, which lists 8 as the least faithful degree of 2⋅A82{\cdot}A_8.

La portée de la loiThe reach of the law

n = 2KleinA560n = 3BlichfeldtA560A6360PSL(2,7)168n = 4BlichfeldtA560A6360A72520PSL(2,7)168PSp(4,3)25920
Plate 18.2The short lists: the simple groups with a primitive projective representation of dimension 2, 3 or 4 in characteristic zero, Klein’s for n=2n=2 and Blichfeldt’s for n=3n=3 and 4, with their orders.

The exceptions have a common cause, and in small dimension it decides almost everything. A lattice with residue Vˉ\bar V gives a projective representation of SS in PGL⁡(n,C)\PGL(n,\C). It is faithful, because an element acting by a scalar acts by a scalar on the residue, and irreducible, because the residue is. A system of imprimitivity with k>1k>1 blocks would give a homomorphism S→SkS\to S_k with k≤n≤4k\le n\le4; SkS_k is solvable and SS is simple and non-abelian, so the map is trivial and the representation reducible. The image is therefore primitive, and the primitive finite subgroups of PGL⁡(n,C)\PGL(n,\C) for n≤4n\le4 are on Klein’s list for n=2n=2 and Blichfeldt’s for n=3,4n=3,4.

Proposition(The reach of the law in small dimension) proved

Let SS be a finite non-abelian simple group and Vˉ\bar V a faithful, absolutely irreducible projective representation of SS of dimension n≤4n\le4 over a finite field: the natural module of a life, say, or the conic module of PSL⁡(2,q)\PSL(2,q) for qq odd.

(1) If Vˉ\bar V is a residue of a lattice over the integers of a number field, then SS is isomorphic to a primitive finite subgroup of PGL⁡(n,C)\PGL(n,\C): for n=2n=2 to A5A_5; for n=3n=3 to A5A_5, A6A_6 or PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7); for n=4n=4 to A5A_5, A6A_6, A7A_7, PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) or PSp(4,3)\mathrm{PSp}(4,3).

(2) Let Vˉ\bar V be such a residue, with character χ\chi, and α\alpha an automorphism of SS. Then α\alpha is realized at Vˉ\bar V by a nontrivial Galois element, as in the type law, if and only if for some lift χ∘α\chi\circ\alpha is a Galois conjugate of χ\chi different from χ\chi. If χ∘α=χ\chi\circ\alpha=\chi, then α\alpha is realized by a linear map at every prime where the reduction is absolutely irreducible. If every lift is rational and moved by α\alpha, no Galois element realizes α\alpha at Vˉ\bar V.

Proof

(1) is the argument above. (2) The type law needs χσ=χ∘α\chi^\sigma=\chi\circ\alpha, and such a σ\sigma exists exactly when χ∘α\chi\circ\alpha lies in the Galois orbit of χ\chi; a rational character is fixed by every Galois element, so it can realize only an α\alpha that fixes it. If χ∘α=χ\chi\circ\alpha=\chi, then ρ∘α≅ρ\rho\circ\alpha\cong\rho, and at a prime of absolutely irreducible reduction any two stable lattices are homothetic, so the intertwiner can be scaled to an automorphism of the local lattice, whose reduction realizes α\alpha linearly.

Les exceptions expliquéesThe exceptions explained

Klein, Blichfeldtn = 2n = 3n = 4n = 6A5PSL(2,4), PSL(2,5)the icosiansPSL(2,8)P1(F8)PSL(2,7)PSL(3,2), PSL(2,7)Klein’s latticeA6the hexad, PSL(2,9)Valentiner’s latticeU3(3)Hermitian plane over F9PSp(4,3)PSp(4,3), PSU(4,2)E8 over Z[ω]A6Sp(4,2)'A8GL(4,2)U3(3)G2(2)'
Plate 18.3The lives of the first computations, by the dimension of the module: seen by the law (gold, with the lattice), blind because the group is too large for the list (ink, struck through), blind because the lifts are rational (blue). The lists reach to the dashed line.

So a life is blind to the law in one of two ways. Either its group is too large to act projectively in its module’s dimension in characteristic zero: PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8), of order 504, in dimension 2; U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3), of order 6048, in dimension 3; A8A_8, of order 20160, in dimension 4. Or its lifts are rational, so the outer automorphism exchanges characters that no Galois element moves: A6A_6 as Sp(4,2)′\mathrm{Sp}(4,2)', and U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3) as G2(2)′G_2(2)'.

The lives the law sees are the remaining kind, lifts on the lists whose characters the Galois group moves, and each comes with its lattice: the icosians, Klein’s lattice, Valentiner’s lattice and E8E_8 over Z[ω]\Z[\omega].

Corollary(The exceptions, explained) proved

(1) The life of PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8) on P1(F8)\Proj^1(\F_8) (dimension 2), the life of U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3) on its hermitian plane over F9\F_9 (dimension 3), and the life of A8A_8 as GL⁡(4,2)\GL(4,2) (dimension 4) are residues of no lattice: their groups are not on the lists. (2) The life of A6A_6 as Sp(4,2)′\mathrm{Sp}(4,2)' (dimension 4) is a residue, since A6A_6 is on the list for n=4n=4, but its lifts are the rational 4-dimensional characters of 2⋅A62{\cdot}A_6, which the outer automorphism exchanges, so no Galois element realizes it there.

(3) The life of U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3) as G2(2)′G_2(2)' (dimension 6) has only the rational, invariant lift 6a6a; the outer automorphism is realized there by a linear map, through the full group G2(2)G_2(2), and by no Galois element. (4) The lives the law sees, those of A5A_5, PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), A6A_6 through Valentiner’s lattice and PSp(4,3)≅PSU(4,2)\mathrm{PSp}(4,3)\cong\mathrm{PSU}(4,2), are exactly the lifts on the lists whose characters the Galois group moves.

La droite sur Fq\F_qThe line over a finite field

60: A5, the icosians360: A6, Valentiner’s lattice168: PSL(2,7), Klein’s lattice10210310410551020304049q|PSL(2,q)|4579
Plate 18.4∣PSL⁡(2,q)∣|\PSL(2,q)| for the prime powers qq from 4 to 49, on a logarithmic scale, against the orders 60, 168 and 360 of the groups on the lists: only q=4,5,7,9q=4,5,7,9 meet them, each with its lattice.

The projective line is the first test. Its natural module has dimension 2 and, for qq odd, its conic module dimension 3, so a residue would make PSL⁡(2,q)\PSL(2,q) isomorphic to A5A_5, A6A_6 or PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), and the orders decide. The values left are those of the exceptional isomorphisms, and at each of them the lattice exists: the icosians for q=4,5q=4,5, Klein’s lattice for q=7q=7, Valentiner’s for q=9q=9.

Corollary(The line over Fq\F_q) proved

For q≥4q\ge4, the life of PSL⁡(2,q)\PSL(2,q) on P1(Fq)\Proj^1(\F_q) is a residue, through its natural module or, for qq odd, its conic module, only if q∈{4,5,7,9}q\in\{4,5,7,9\}. These are exactly the qq for which PSL⁡(2,q)\PSL(2,q) has an exceptional isomorphism: A5≅PSL⁡(2,4)≅PSL⁡(2,5)A_5\cong\PSL(2,4)\cong\PSL(2,5), PSL⁡(2,7)≅PSL⁡(3,2)\PSL(2,7)\cong\PSL(3,2), PSL⁡(2,9)≅A6\PSL(2,9)\cong A_6. For these four values the lattices exist: the icosians, Klein’s lattice and Valentiner’s.

Proof

By the reach of the law, PSL⁡(2,q)\PSL(2,q) would be isomorphic to A5A_5, A6A_6 or PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7). The orders q(q2−1)/gcd⁡(2,q−1)q(q^2-1)/\gcd(2,q-1) equal 60, 168 and 360 only for q∈{4,5}q\in\{4,5\}, q=7q=7 and q=9q=9.

Résidus, résidus quaternioniques, cœursResidues, quaternionic residues, hearts

lattice mod pradicalthe quotientthe natural module ofA4 mod 2t = 0: residue4-dim., orthogonal, −O-(4,2) ≅ S5row 7A4 mod 5t = 1: heart3-dim., orthogonal, oddthe conic of PGL(2,5)A5 mod 2t = 1: heart4-dim., symplecticSp(4,2) ≅ S6A5 mod 3t = 1: heart4-dim., orthogonal, −Ω-(4,3).2 ≅ S6row 24A7 mod 2t = 1: heart6-dim., orthogonal, +O+(6,2) ≅ S8row 22E6 mod 2t = 0: residue6-dim., orthogonal, −O-(6,2) ≅ W(E6)row 12E6 mod 3t = 1: heart5-dim., orthogonal, oddSO(5,3)E7 mod 2t = 1: heart6-dim., symplecticSp(6,2) ≅ W(E7)/{±1}row 23E8 mod 2t = 0: residue8-dim., orthogonal, +O+(8,2) ≅ W(E8)/{±1}row 16
Plate 18.5Kneser’s family, computed: each root lattice modulo a prime, with the radical of its form, the geometry of the quotient and the verdict, a residue where the form is nondegenerate (gold), a heart with one trivial factor otherwise (blue).

To remove the bound on the dimension the drafts widen both sides. A life is now an isomorphism of SS with X/Z(X)X/Z(X) for XX any classical or exceptional group on its natural module: SL⁡(n,q)\SL(n,q), the conic module of PSL⁡(2,q)\PSL(2,q), SU(n,q)\mathrm{SU}(n,q), Sp(2m,q)\mathrm{Sp}(2m,q), the orthogonal groups, and the exceptional groups on their minimal modules, from G2(q)G_2(q) in dimension 7 (or 6 in characteristic 2) to E8(q)E_8(q) in dimension 248. And a lift may be of three kinds: a residue as before; a quaternionic residue, the reduction of a lattice over a maximal order of a quaternion algebra at a prime where the algebra ramifies; or a heart, a reduction whose composition factors are the natural module once and the trivial module tt times.

Each kind gives a degree bound. Write d0(S)d_0(S) for the least degree of a nontrivial irreducible projective complex representation of SS. A residue needs n≥d0(S)n\ge d_0(S), a quaternionic residue a character of degree exactly 2n2n, and a heart has t≤dim⁡H1(S,Vˉ∗)≤n/2t\le\dim H^1(S,\bar V^*)\le n/2, by the bound of Guralnick and Hoffman, so that n+t≥d0(S)n+t\ge d_0(S). The least degree grows exponentially in the rank (Landazuri, Seitz and Zalesskii) while nn grows linearly, so only finitely many lives can lift. Kneser’s family shows the senses side by side: a root lattice modulo a prime is a residue where its form stays nondegenerate and a heart with one trivial factor where it acquires a radical.

Lemma(Three degree bounds) proved

(1) If Vˉ\bar V is a residue, then n≥d0(S)n\ge d_0(S). (2) If Vˉ\bar V is a quaternionic residue, then S^\hat S has an irreducible character of degree exactly 2n2n with local Schur index 2 at a prime over pp; in particular 2n≥d0(S)2n\ge d_0(S). (3) If Vˉ\bar V is a heart with tt trivial factors, then Z(S^)Z(\hat S) acts trivially on Vˉ\bar V, t≤dim⁡H1(S,Vˉ∗)≤n/2t\le\dim H^1(S,\bar V^*)\le n/2, and n+t≥d0(S)n+t\ge d_0(S).

Proof

(1) and (2): a residue is the reduction of a character χ\chi with χ∘=φ\chi^\circ=\varphi, of degree nn; a quaternionic one, of a character of degree 2n2n with Schur index 2 at pp; neither is trivial on SS. (3) Over the completion, take a lattice generated by one vector of the image of an idempotent belonging to Vˉ\bar V; its reduction has simple head Vˉ\bar V and, by Brauer–Nesbitt, a radical of tt trivial factors, which is ktk^t since S^\hat S is perfect. The extension classes are linearly independent in Ext⁡1(Vˉ,k)=H1(S,Vˉ∗)\operatorname{Ext}^1(\bar V,k)=H^1(S,\bar V^*), and Guralnick and Hoffman bound that by n/2n/2.

Les vies qui se relèventThe lives that lift

n234567826A51A52A618A53PSL(2,7)4PSL(2,7)5A66U3(3)19A57A68U4(2)9U4(2)10A624U4(2)11U5(2)20U4(2)12U4(3)13U3(3)14G2(4)21A822Sp(6,2)23PSL(2,8)15O8+(2)16Tits17residue (17)quaternionic residue (4)heart (3)lattice cited
Plate 18.6The twenty-four lives that lift, by the dimension of the natural module: residues (gold), quaternionic residues (blue), hearts (open). After dimension 8 the next is 26, the Tits group; the dashed rings mark rows whose lattice is cited rather than built.

The candidates are found by comparing the degree bounds with nn over every family, using Tiep’s lower bounds for the degrees of cross-characteristic representations and, for the groups with lives in two characteristics, the exact degrees in the tables of Hiss and Malle. No life of dimension above 26 survives. Each survivor is then realized or excluded: the residues by lattices, the root lattices among them by Kneser’s method, the Coxeter–Todd lattice K12K_{12} modulo −3\sqrt{-3} by direct computation, and the Tits group by Tiep and Zalesskii’s observation that its two characters of degree 26 stay irreducible modulo 2.

The lattices are familiar ones: root lattices, the Witting lattice, K12K_{12}, Klein’s and Valentiner’s lattices, the icosians, and, for one quaternionic row, the Leech lattice as a lattice over the Hurwitz order. Three reductions are close to the list but are not lives, because their images are proper subgroups: J2<G2(4)J_2<G_2(4), A7<GL⁡(4,2)A_7<\GL(4,2) and Co1<Ω+(24,2)\mathrm{Co}_1<\Omega^+(24,2).

Theorem(Lives that lift) proved

(1) The natural modules that are residues are exactly 17: SL⁡(2,4)\SL(2,4), SL⁡(2,5)\SL(2,5) and the conic Ω(3,5)\Omega(3,5) for A5A_5; the conic Ω(3,7)\Omega(3,7) and SL⁡(3,2)\SL(3,2) for PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7); the conic Ω(3,9)\Omega(3,9) and Sp(4,2)′\mathrm{Sp}(4,2)' for A6A_6; Ω−(4,2)\Omega^-(4,2) for A5A_5; Sp(4,3)\mathrm{Sp}(4,3), SU(4,2)\mathrm{SU}(4,2), Ω(5,3)\Omega(5,3) and Ω−(6,2)\Omega^-(6,2) for U4(2)\mathrm U_4(2); Ω−(6,3)\Omega^-(6,3) for U4(3)\mathrm U_4(3); G2(2)′G_2(2)' for U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3); 2G2(3)′^2G_2(3)' for PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8); Ω+(8,2)\Omega^+(8,2); and 2F4(2)′^2F_4(2)', the Tits group, in dimension 26.

(2) The natural modules that are quaternionic residues but not residues are exactly 4: SL⁡(2,9)\SL(2,9), SU(3,3)\mathrm{SU}(3,3), SU(5,2)\mathrm{SU}(5,2) and G2(4)G_2(4). (3) The natural modules that are hearts but not residues are exactly 3, each with t=1t=1: Ω+(6,2)\Omega^+(6,2) for A8A_8, Sp(6,2)\mathrm{Sp}(6,2), and Ω−(4,3)\Omega^-(4,3) for A6A_6. In every case n≤26n\le26, and n=26n=26 only for the Tits group.

Deux caractéristiques, un réseauTwo characteristics, one lattice

characteristic 2odd characteristicA5the icosiansSL(2,4)SL(2,5), p = 5PSL(2,7)Klein’s latticeSL(3,2)Ω(3,7), p = 7U4(2)the Witting latticeSU(4,2)Sp(4,3), p = 3A6E8 over D3,∞Sp(4,2)'SL(2,9), p = 3U3(3)K12 over D3,∞G2(2)'SU(3,3), p = 3PSL(2,8)SL(2,8)2G2(3)', p = 3only a factor, 1 + 2 + 4
Plate 18.7The six groups with lives in two characteristics: a gold arc where one lattice has both lives as residues, a dashed arc where one lattice carries both once quaternionic residues are admitted, and PSL⁡(2,8)\PSL(2,8), whose life at 2 does not lift. (A6A_6 also has both lives as residues, of different dimensions, through two lattices.)

The exceptional isomorphisms across characteristics are the six groups of the theorem, and the list of lifts sorts them. For A5A_5, PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) and U4(2)\mathrm U_4(2) one lattice has both lives as residues, at two primes: the double life is two reductions of one object in characteristic zero. For A6A_6 and U3(3)\mathrm U_3(3) the same holds once quaternionic residues are admitted, through E8E_8 and K12K_{12} over the maximal order of the quaternion algebra ramified at 3 and ∞\infty. The coincidence A8≅PSL⁡(4,2)A_8\cong\PSL(4,2) is not of this kind on the four-dimensional side: that module lifts in no sense, and A8A_8 reaches it only through the Klein correspondence Λ2\Lambda^2, as the heart Ω+(6,2)\Omega^+(6,2).

PSL⁡(2,8)≅2G2(3)′\PSL(2,8)\cong{}^2G_2(3)' is the one exception. Its life at 3 lifts, as the seven-dimensional Ree lattice, but its life at 2 lifts in no sense: the least degree of a nontrivial projective representation, 7, is too large for a module of dimension 2, and the Ree lattice modulo 2 has it only as a composition factor.

Remark(Kneser’s family)

Root lattices modulo a prime realize the classical coincidences of symmetric and Weyl groups in all three senses: A4/2A4A_4/2A_4 is the natural module of O−(4,2)≅S5\mathrm O^-(4,2)\cong S_5; A4A_4 modulo 5 has the conic of PGL⁡(2,5)\PGL(2,5) as heart; A5A_5 modulo 2 and modulo 3 has those of Sp(4,2)≅S6\mathrm{Sp}(4,2)\cong S_6 and Ω−(4,3).2≅S6\Omega^-(4,3).2\cong S_6 as hearts; A7A_7 modulo 2 has that of O+(6,2)≅S8\mathrm O^+(6,2)\cong S_8; E6/2E6E_6/2E_6 is that of O−(6,2)≅W(E6)\mathrm O^-(6,2)\cong W(E_6), and E6E_6 modulo 3 has that of SO⁡(5,3)\SO(5,3) as heart; E7E_7 modulo 2 has that of Sp(6,2)\mathrm{Sp}(6,2); E8/2E8E_8/2E_8 is that of O+(8,2)≅W(E8)/{±1}\mathrm O^+(8,2)\cong W(E_8)/\{\pm1\}. In each heart the radical of the form is a trivial submodule without an invariant complement.

Ce qui reste à bâtirWhat remains to be built

n234567826A51A52A618A53PSL(2,7)4PSL(2,7)5A66U3(3)19A57A68U4(2)9U4(2)10A624U4(2)11U5(2)20U4(2)12U4(3)13U3(3)14G2(4)21A822Sp(6,2)23PSL(2,8)15O8+(2)16Tits17lift moved by Galoisrational lift, fixedrational lift, exchangedlattice cited
Plate 18.8The same twenty-four lives, coloured by how the type law sees the residues: a lift moved by Galois (gold), a rational lift the outer automorphism fixes (ink) or exchanges (blue); the quaternionic rows and the hearts are grey, and the dashed rings mark the rows still resting on cited constructions.

The type law sees a row exactly when its lift is moved by Galois. Of the residues, rows with Galois-moved lifts include the new ones of the Witting lattice, K12K_{12} and the Tits group; rows with rational lifts fixed by the outer automorphisms in question realize them linearly; and Sp(4,2)′\mathrm{Sp}(4,2)' keeps its rational lifts exchanged, which no Galois element realizes. At Ω(5,3)\Omega(5,3) complex conjugation is ramified at −3\sqrt{-3} and swaps 5a5a and 5b5b, so the outer automorphism of U4(2)\mathrm U_4(2) is realized by a linear map, SO⁡(5,3)\SO(5,3) acting through W(E6)W(E_6); the row of K12K_{12} is of the same ramified type. For the Tits group the same holds at −2\sqrt{-2} if its outer automorphism exchanges 26a26a and 26b26b, which the ATLAS listings suggest and nothing in the drafts decides.

The next computations the drafts list: the two quaternionic rows of characteristic 2 computed rather than cited, the Leech lattice over the Hurwitz order modulo 1+i1+i for G2(4)G_2(4) and the rank-5 lattice for U5(2)\mathrm U_5(2); the Tits lattice over Z[−2]\Z[\sqrt{-2}] and the action of its outer automorphism; the type law on the new rows; and a seam reading of the exception PSL⁡(2,8)≅2G2(3)′\PSL(2,8)\cong{}^2G_2(3)', residue against composition factor. Each reduction on the list is classical, but the complete list in its three senses was not found in the sources searched.

Remark(Which rows the type law sees)

By the reach of the law, the type law realizes an outer automorphism at a residue exactly when its lift is moved by Galois. Rows with Galois-moved lifts: SL⁡(2,4)\SL(2,4), SL⁡(2,5)\SL(2,5) and the conic Ω(3,5)\Omega(3,5) for A5A_5; the conic Ω(3,7)\Omega(3,7) and SL⁡(3,2)\SL(3,2) for PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7); the conic Ω(3,9)\Omega(3,9) for A6A_6; Sp(4,3)\mathrm{Sp}(4,3), SU(4,2)\mathrm{SU}(4,2) and Ω(5,3)\Omega(5,3) for U4(2)\mathrm U_4(2); Ω−(6,3)\Omega^-(6,3); the Ree group 2G2(3)′^2G_2(3)'; and the Tits group. Rows with rational lifts fixed by the outer automorphisms in question, realized linearly: Ω−(4,2)\Omega^-(4,2), Ω−(6,2)\Omega^-(6,2), G2(2)′G_2(2)' and Ω+(8,2)\Omega^+(8,2), triality on the last changing the cover. The row Sp(4,2)′\mathrm{Sp}(4,2)' has rational lifts exchanged by the outer automorphism, which no Galois element realizes.

What is held: the prototype in dimension at most four, the five early exceptions explained, the projective line over Fq\F_q settled, and the classification in every dimension, proved modulo the classification results it cites, with its consequence that every exceptional isomorphism across characteristics except PSL⁡(2,8)≅2G2(3)′\PSL(2,8)\cong{}^2G_2(3)' is two reductions of one lattice.

What would finish the work around the theorem: the rows that rest on cited constructions built, the Tits row’s outer automorphism decided, the type law run on the new rows, and a search of the literature that finds the list or confirms it is new. Beside it stand the other chantiers, which ask questions about the whole network of incarnations at once: whether every natural identification comes from the arithmetic source (chapter 16), and whether a group’s order is the product of its local lives (chapter 19).

Objects
the sky