gauge
Floor 2, Les sutures · introduced in Chapter 4, La monodromie des sutures
What does a seam system become once an alignment is chosen at every incarnation?
A choice of alignments, one for each incarnation of a seam system over a graph; it turns the seams into link variables in , so that a seam system is a lattice gauge connection and its monodromy is holonomy.
Let be a connected graph, each edge taken with both orientations, the reverse of . A seam system over for an object assigns an incarnation to each vertex and a seam to each oriented edge from to , with . Let .
(a) A choice of alignments , one per vertex, a gauge, turns the system into link variables , with . Another gauge replaces by , a gauge transformation, and every family with arises from a seam system.
(b) The monodromy of a cycle at is , the holonomy read through the alignment at . Its conjugacy class in does not depend on the gauge, so every class function of the holonomy, such as for a character of , a Wilson loop, is gauge invariant; if is abelian the holonomy itself is.
(c) The system is coherent if and only if every holonomy is trivial, if and only if it is gauge equivalent to the system with all .
(d) If is the 1-skeleton of a 2-complex , the holonomy around every 2-cell is trivial (the connection is flat) if and only if holonomy defines a homomorphism ; the system is then coherent if and only if this homomorphism is trivial.
(e) For fixed incarnations, the gauge classes of seam systems over correspond to the homomorphisms up to conjugation in .
(a) is a -automorphism of , and ; given , put . (b) The monodromy telescopes to , and a change of gauge conjugates the product by . (c) A connected system is coherent exactly when its seams are induced by one choice of alignments. (d) is the quotient of the free group by the normal subgroup generated by the boundaries of the 2-cells. (e) In the gauge with along a spanning tree, the remaining link variables are the images of free generators of , and the residual gauge freedom is one , acting by conjugation.
None of this is new: it is the dictionary between local systems on a graph and representations of its fundamental group, in the language of lattice gauge theory. What seam theory supplies is the gauge group, , and the examples. The two natural seams between the flexes and their tangents form a cycle of length two whose holonomy is , of order 3 in ; since is abelian, itself is gauge invariant.
Call two of the 28 pairs of points of adjacent when they share a point: the Johnson graph , with 168 edges. Its 280 triangles of pairs through a common point are the 2-cells of a 2-complex , the complex of stars. In the Weil representation of , read through the octonions, there is a family of algebras , one over each pair. Along the edge from to , transport by the odd lift of the unique element of order 7 fixing with .
(a) Conjugation by carries the algebra over onto the algebra over , so the transports form a seam system for the family. (b) Around every 2-cell the transports compose to the identity: the connection is flat. (c) In a gauge along a spanning tree every link variable lies in the stabilizer , of order 12, of the base pair, and the holonomy group is all of ; around a triangle , which is not a 2-cell, the holonomy exchanges and . (d) Every holonomy element acts on the algebra over the base pair by an inner automorphism, and acts trivially, so the holonomy acts on through a group of order 6. (e) The Wilson loops of the traces on and on take the values , , , , on holonomy elements of orders 1, 2, 3, 4, 6.
The complex of stars has free fundamental group of rank 21, that of the complete graph on the eight points; a loop is a closed walk on the eight points, and its holonomy exchanges the two points of the base pair exactly when the walk has odd length. Around a triangle the holonomy is the involution exchanging with and with its harmonic conjugate with respect to and ; around a 4-cycle its multiplier is the square of the cross-ratio of the two diagonals.
For a closed walk traced by a loop of at , choose nonzero vectors on the points and put , the corner factors, with indices modulo . Let be the holonomy, and , the products of the , , over odd and even . If is even, and ; if is odd, , and . For the eigenvalue on is the cross-ratio itself.
The transport at the corner is unipotent, so it fixes and preserves the bracket; it sends to , since . The image of moves at the odd corners and that of at the even ones, each collecting its factors. For odd , , since every bracket of the walk occurs once in a numerator, reversed, and once in a denominator. The law was also checked by machine on 36072 closed walks; a law guessed before the computation, a product of cross-ratios over the odd corners, fails at .
A holonomy element fixing the base pair acts on the algebra over it by an inner automorphism when it commutes with left multiplication by on the complement of , and by an outer one, complex conjugation followed by an inner automorphism, when it anticommutes. An element of is proper if it lies in and improper otherwise.
(a) An element of carries the family of algebras to itself if and only if it is proper; an improper one carries the algebra over the base pair to an algebra outside the family. (b) On the stabilizer of the base pair in , the six proper elements are inner, and the six improper ones neither commute nor anticommute. (c) So every connection on a graph on the 28 pairs whose transports come from and carry the family has inner holonomy. (d) Of the twelve -equivariant connections on with transports in , six are proper on every edge and carry the family with inner holonomy, among them the connection on the complex of stars; six are improper and do not carry it, among them the reflection connection, whose holonomy is improper exactly around the loops of odd length. (e) The connection on the Coxeter graph given by the bracket rule is proper and has inner holonomy.
The prediction made before the computation, that improper transports would give outer holonomy around odd loops, failed, and the alternative registered with it holds. The improper elements carry the family to a second family, that of the mirror table, the octonion table relabelled by ; at each pair the unique seam between the two families is conjugation by the harmonic reflection of the pair, one of the 28 polarities of the Fano plane, and an improper connection is a proper one followed by that seam. The table is one point of a circle of products , , each with its own family of algebras, and the improper elements act on the circle by a reflection exchanging the table and its mirror. Its fixed points lie at the phase of the prime over 2, with , and the two families there are invariant under all of , an improper element fixing a pair acting on the algebra over it by an outer automorphism. But the sixteen vectors of the Weil representation multiply among themselves only at the table and its mirror: integrality forces the two families apart, and with them inner holonomy.
The group carries the base vertex of the tree at 7, the scale tree, to other vertices and back, and the octonion table with its signs is carried along. Fix the edge , whose stabilizer is the Iwahori subgroup of the matrices of with lower left entry in ; choose one parent for each vertex, rooted at , and frames in which every parent sits at . The holonomy of at acts, through the double life read in Klein’s lattice and with the table’s light direction at , on the seven points of the Fano plane, and the signed relabellings of the table , which form a group of order 1344, realize each collineation in eight ways. The residual is the least number of units sent to by a relabelling over : it is 0 on the Borel subgroup fixing , of order 21, and 2 on the other 147 elements, and when it is 2 exactly three relabellings reverse two units, each the two other points of one of the three lines through a point , and none reverses .
(1) A loop at is realized by a relabelling that reverses no unit if and only if is the parent of , equivalently ; otherwise every relabelling that realizes it reverses at least two units, and the best reverse exactly two. (2) The condition depends only on the coset and is unchanged by on the left. In the decomposition of into double cosets by the infinite dihedral group generated by , fixing , and , fixing , it holds exactly when the reduced word of ends in . (3) For every loop , the 168 loops , with running over modulo the kernel of its action on the link of , have 168 distinct holonomies, 21 of residual 0 and 147 of residual 2. At distance the oriented edges reached split into that point toward and that do not. (4) The proportion one in eight is the same for every such choice of parents and every base vertex.
So the edge stabilizer is the largest subgroup on which the signed table is carried by relabellings without reversals.
The collineations with a relabelling of all positive signs form , the stabilizer of ; composing with such relabellings on both sides preserves the number of reversed units, so is constant on the two Bruhat cells, and its value on the big cell was computed. (1) In every frame the parent sits at , and so does ; the loop carries the parent to the parent exactly when fixes . (2) fixes and preserves the choice of parents; the double cosets are indexed by the affine Weyl group, since is dense in and is the stabilizer of . (3) The cocycle identity ; each of the vertices at distance has eight outgoing edges, one of them toward . Checked by exact computation in on representative loops, on random multiples of them by and on five full families .
has infinitely many primitive hyperbolic conjugacy classes of each translation length, and with the elements and are conjugate in while their residuals at are 2 and 0. So the residual is not a function of the conjugacy class, the signed table defines no homomorphism on the loop group, and there is no twist of Ihara’s zeta function by it on any quotient of the scale tree.
The route through Ihara’s zeta function and its Artin–Ihara twists is closed twice: is not a tree lattice, and the signed table gives no class function. A third obstruction is internal: the relabelling group is a non-split extension, and every relabelling over a collineation of order four has order eight, so does not act on the signs at all.
The elements , , have traces of valuation at , which forces translation length 2, and the traces are distinct. The two diagonal elements are conjugate by , and the residuals were computed.
Let and , a complex structure on that splits into two quartets. is the stabilizer of a unit spinor in , and the stabilizer of is in and in , whose chiral spinors are the two quartets. Call a holonomy misaligned when it moves the table’s light direction , and let be its collineation, one of the 147 outside . Then no relabelling over preserves or reverses it: is for the three relabellings of residual 2, for four and for one.
(1) There is an orthogonal map of , unique up to sign, with for every . It commutes with , and it is an automorphism of , up to sign, exactly when fixes ; the maps form a copy of . (2) Every relabelling over is , where are the units it reverses. (3) Of the 128 realizations of in , exactly 2 preserve , namely , exactly 8 preserve the product, the relabellings, and none preserves both unless fixes .
(1) The generate an irreducible Clifford module on , so an intertwiner is unique up to scalar; existence was computed for all 168 collineations, and is carried to itself. From , is an automorphism exactly when . (2) and the Clifford product over the reversed units both conjugate each to with the same signs, so by Schur’s lemma they agree up to a scalar. (3) A realization preserving fixes and so reverses no unit; one preserving the product lies in ; both together put in . Computed.
For a misaligned holonomy let be the table with its light direction and the table that carries across the loop. The unit of is , where is the point of the antiflag whose pair is . and have the same metric, the same and the same Cayley form of left type, the 4-form preserved by the spin group that the products generate; their associative 3-forms differ, and their common derivations form .
(1) The following agree for and : the edges of the Coxeter graph and their involutions; the Fano orientation on the labels, modulo sign changes of the units; the assignment of points read from each table’s own tour; the face half-turns; for each of the 70 four-sets of , whether the product of its four units is real and otherwise which point its imaginary unit names; ; and the Cayley form of left type. (2) The unit moves from the line of 1 to the line of , and the plane is a unital subalgebra of only for , where exchanges the roles of the unit and . (3) The planes carried by the maps from the seven pairs through form a family that every carries to itself, and it agrees with the planes exactly on those seven.
So at one scale only the table’s unit tells the two transports apart. An expectation registered before the computation, that the two tables share the Cayley form built from the triple cross product, failed: that form is preserved by the spin group of right multiplications, and the form of left type, identified afterwards, is the shared one.
Each object in (1) is built from the projective line, the labels, and the left spin structure by constructions covariant under , which realizes on the line and on the labels; computed for all 147. A common automorphism of and fixes 1 and , so it lies in , and conversely.
Let each of the 28 antiflags carry its own copy of the table, the copies compared only along the edges of the Coxeter graph by the flat class of comparisons. Write for the point of an antiflag and for the 96 relabellings fixing , which lie in . Over a collineation , a per-observer transport chooses a relabelling over at each antiflag, with signs given by ; it is clock-keeping when every , and a single map when every is the same. Along every edge the transformed comparison carries to , so it keeps the edge’s class exactly when : the signs form a -cocycle on the Coxeter graph, and since the graph is connected they are constant.
Let be a misaligned holonomy and its collineation. (1) At every antiflag exactly four of the eight relabellings over keep its point, and any two of them differ by an element of , so the clock-keeping transport is unique up to at every antiflag. (2) Every clock-keeping choice satisfies all 42 edges; one takes for a relabelling of residual 2 whose reversed pair avoids . (3) The transformed comparisons are gauge equivalent to the flat class by elements of the groups . (4) For every antiflag , the transport back along any path composed with lies in . (5) In every antiflag’s frame, at the target point restores .
(1) The relabellings over form a coset of the eight sign changes, and keeping fixes the sign at . (2) The sign condition, and the three relabellings of residual 2, which reverse each point other than once and never. (3) and (4) By flatness. (5) at a unit carries back to when that unit is not reversed. All parts were computed on the 147 misaligned holonomies, on random gauge representatives and for twenty random clock-keeping choices per holonomy.
Every pair of distinct points is joined by exactly two edges of the Coxeter graph, and no edge joins antiflags with the same point. A single map over that reverses a set of points fails the edge condition exactly on the of the 42 edges that join to its complement, also after any element of at the targets. Over a misaligned holonomy the eight single maps fail at 20 edges (the three of residual 2), 24 (four) and 12 (one), so none is consistent with the edges; over an aligned holonomy the unsigned map fails nowhere.
Let be the Coxeter graph with its 24 heptagons as faces. (1) and , so a comparison system that is trivial around every heptagon is trivial around every closed path, whatever its structure group. (2) For one broken loop the flat data on the mapping torus form : a reversal of every antiflag together, never of a pattern of points. (3) and ; so if the symmetries of the scale tree act by lifts consistent with the edges, the global sign they assign is trivial.
Over the stabilizer of an antiflag the extension splits, faithfully, by clock-keeping lifts, and the induced lifts form an honest action of the 168 collineations on the 28 copies; so the relabellings, which cannot act on one table without leaving signs, act honestly antiflag by antiflag. A flat comparison system invariant under this action would give a homomorphism of into a group of order 96 restricting to that faithful splitting, which simplicity forbids; with values in it would be one of Klein’s representations or .
(1) The heptagons’ boundaries have rank 15 over and over , with all Smith invariants 1; the fundamental group was computed by coset enumeration. (2) of the mapping torus is by (1). (3) is Euclidean, so is generated by elementary matrices. For a homomorphism to , is additive, and conjugation by gives , so vanishes on , of index 3, and so everywhere; likewise for . is the amalgam of two conjugates of and is generated by them. The split action was checked on all pairs at all 28 antiflags.
Each vertex of the scale tree carries a Coxeter graph on the 28 pairs of its link. Take the root and its child in direction 0. A site of the two-frame truncation is a pair of its 14 boundary classes: the 21 root-side pairs, the 21 fine pairs in the link of , and 49 mixed sites, seen at as a pair and at as ; two sites meet at a frame when both are its pairs and are joined there by an edge of its Coxeter graph. In a fine pair has exactly 49 coarse partners, all over one pair of the child frame, and the coarse pairs over a residue disk join the two stars by a complete bipartite graph .
(1) The truncation has 91 sites and 336 meetings and no triangles. Its 882 four-cycles lie inside one frame, through two sites over one pair, and their holonomy is the identity for every frame-dependent link. (2) It has exactly 882 five-cycles, all crossing scales, 441 with three meetings at each frame; with the frames flat, all are trivial exactly when the identifications across scales are constant. (3) With each frame’s lifted heptagons and four-cycles as faces the complex has , without torsion; adding the five-cycles gives and a simply connected complex, so across one edge of the tree a flat comparison system is unique up to gauge once the five-cycles are flat. (4) For a hopping with one hop of unit amplitude per meeting, carrying the block of its comparison, in every background with reversible links for does not depend on the background, and , with over the five-cycles.
Closed walks of length at most four are backtracks and four-cycles, which are trivial, and a closed five-walk in a graph without triangles is a five-cycle, traversed in 10 ways. Simple connectivity follows by van Kampen over the 49 mixed sites and the connectedness of the rook’s graph. The enumeration, the ranks and the moments were computed.
Put Wilson’s weight on the heptagons and on each five-cycle, and integrate out the finest frames. A star, the seven pairs through one point of a frame’s projective line, has members pairwise at distance three with a unique 3-path, and the 21 transports along these paths form its star connection; the 3-path map from the cycle space of to the frame’s is an isomorphism. At leading order in , integrating out a child frame with any positive semi-definite effective form on its 42 links, together with the 49 cross links, induces on the parent’s star connection the form , whatever the child’s form, with the projector onto the cycle space of . With its seven children integrated out a frame’s effective form is reached after one level and unchanged by deeper levels; on the 15 physical directions its eigenvalues against the heptagon form are , with (six times each), (twice) and (once).
Every plaquette weight of the tower is ferromagnetic, and for the factors of the signs and for every Wilson loop of a frame is non-decreasing as children are attached, by the inequalities of Griffiths and Ginibre. Refining each meeting to level two copies loops rather than subdividing them: every meeting becomes seven disjoint copies of , every heptagon lifts to exactly heptagons of full length, no loop is subdivided, and at leading order the coarse coupling is times the fine one.
Each row of cross links can absorb only the gradient part of the star connection, which leaves per row, and a flat child with cross links constant down each column attains this bound. For the refinement, each lifted heptagon carries a flux whose mean is the coarse flux, so convexity gives the factor , attained by the pulled-back configuration. The spectrum, the decimation of random, rigid and zero child forms and the certificate on one heptagon’s fibre were computed.
- Built from
- seam systemseam monodromyalignment
- Builds
- orientation
- In the Esquisse
- 5Courte marche à travers la théorie de Galois11Le revêtement double et le miroir12Où se rencontrent les deux parents13Orientation et charge16Une loi de réciprocité
- The volume’s word
- meeting
- In the volume
- XVIIITwo Parents of the Sky