kernel
Floor 3, Ce qui est su · introduced in Chapter 1, Un objet, plusieurs noms
What does a description forget?
The stabilizer of the image of a point under a description: what the description cannot tell apart there. It covers the kernel of a homomorphism, the stabilizer of an orbit and the congruence kernel of a reduction.
G-sets and G-maps · stabilizers and normalizers · orbitals · permutation isomorphism · Gassmann equivalence · the table of marks
The kernel of a description at a point is , the stabilizer of the image of ; what forgets at is the fibre of through it.
(a) If is a surjective homomorphism, regarded as a description of the regular -set by the -set , its kernel at 1 is . (b) For a point of a -set, the orbit description has kernel at 1; so the stabilizer principle says that an object is the regular set with the kernel of its orbit description divided out. (c) If is a description between transitive -sets with and , then , the kernel at is , and what forgets at is a copy of .
These are classical, and no novelty is claimed for them. What the definition adds is a single word for three situations that the following results treat alike.
(a) exactly when . (b) exactly when . (c) implies , and the fibre is .
Let be a surjective homomorphism of finite groups with kernel . A transitive -set comes from a -set through if and only if acts on it trivially, if and only if . If is central of prime order, then acts on every transitive -set either trivially or without fixed points.
For the double cover the kernel is , and the objects it cannot see are the four new objects, those on which the kernel acts without fixed points.
is normal, so it fixes the coset exactly when , that is, when , and then it fixes every coset. If is central, fixes exactly when , whatever ; if is prime, is or 1.
Let be a primitive cube root of unity, and , a prime of norm 7. The reduction is a description with kernel . Let act on the Hermitian matrices by , preserving , and put ,
(a) The images of , , lie in . (b) The quadratic forms invariant under and are spanned by and the square of the lower diagonal entry. (c) The quadratic forms invariant under , and are the multiples of . Hence the quadratic forms invariant under are the multiples of the Minkowski form.
(a) Each has determinant 1, entries in and off-diagonal entries in . (b), (c) By machine: in a rational basis the three actions are rational matrices, and the invariant symmetric matrices solve linear equations. The form is invariant under all of .
The conceptual reason is Borel’s density theorem: is a lattice in , hence Zariski dense, so it has the same polynomial invariants as . The computation makes the statement independent of that theorem, and no novelty is claimed for it.
For each imaginary unit of the octonion table, the description of the derivation algebra by its effect on , , maps onto the 6-dimensional orthogonal complement of . Its kernel is the algebra , of dimension 8, which commutes with left multiplication by .
The concepts that record what is known about seams can all be stated with descriptions. A built bridge is a description that forgets nothing. An absence is an empty fibre: the orbit types of a finite -set are read from its marks by inverting the table of marks, so a forced gap is an empty fibre of the orbit-type description, and the window of an absence is the image of its invariant. A carrier imprint is induced from what an orbit description forgets. And monodromy is what remains of the loops once the kernel of the holonomy is divided out. Each statement reformulates classical facts, and no novelty is claimed.
- Built from
- description
- Builds
- seam theory
- In the Esquisse
- 5Courte marche à travers la théorie de Galois10La table en deux, en sept et à l’infini
- The volume’s word
- kernel