Universal Kernel

spinor system

What does the defining representation of the Bianchi group carry at the cusps of the link complement?

The local system VV on the congruence link complement given by the defining representation of SL⁡(2,Z[ω])\SL(2,\Z[\omega]). Its boundary scattering is one constant times the Paley matrix; its cusp lines transform as VV and not as its mirror Vˉ\bar V; and the moves between pairs of cusps keep that class.

∞(1, 0)0(0, 1)1(1, 1)1 + ω(1 + ω, 1)pairs sharing a cusp: parabolicu∞(1): z ↦ z + 1holomorphic: keeps the class of V∞(1, 0)0(0, 1)1(1, 1)1 + ω(1 + ω, 1)opposite pairs: order 4 in 2T∞ ↔ 1 + ω, 0 ↔ 1holomorphic: keeps the class of V
Plate 6.2The tetrahedron T0T_0 with cusps ∞\infty, 0, 1, 1+ω1+\omega: four cusp lines and six pairs of cusps. A move between two pairs that share a cusp is parabolic, a move to the opposite pair has order 4 in 2T2T, and every move keeps the class of VV.
Theorem(The scattering constant) computed

Let VV be the local system on MM given by the defining representation of SL⁡(2,Z[ω])\SL(2,\Z[\omega]), restricted to Γ(p)\Gamma(\mathfrak p). At a cusp, with translations tbt_b, a cocycle of VV restricts to z(b)=(sb2/2+Ab+Bbˉ, sb)z(b)=(sb^2/2+Ab+B\bar b,\ sb), with ss holomorphic in the parameter of the cusp and BB antiholomorphic. The boundary image of H1(M;V)H^1(M;V) is the graph s=LVBs=L_VB of an antisymmetric matrix LVL_V with zero diagonal, indexed by the eight cusps ∞,0,…,6\infty,0,\dots,6. Let Θ\Theta be the Paley matrix on these indices, with border Θ∞a=1\Theta_{\infty a}=1, Θa∞=−1\Theta_{a\infty}=-1 and inner entries the Legendre symbol (b−a7)\bigl(\frac{b-a}7\bigr).

The stable Z[ω]\Z[\omega]-lattices in Q(ω)2\Q(\omega)^2 are all homothetic to Z[ω]2\Z[\omega]^2, and this lattice fixes the boundary scattering up to one sign, the labelling of the deck group by SL⁡(2,7)\SL(2,7) up to inner automorphisms. In this integral framing, with the deck group labelled by reduction modulo p\mathfrak p:

(a) LV=y ΘL_V=y\,\Theta with no further signs, where

y=−2ω−3(3+ω)2=22−4ω49,∣y∣2=1249;y=\frac{-2\omega\sqrt{-3}}{(3+\omega)^2}=\frac{22-4\omega}{49},\qquad |y|^2=\frac{12}{49};

(b) the eigenspace of Θ\Theta for −−7-\sqrt{-7} is the quartet 4\mathbf4, on which (1101)\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}\right) has trace (1+−7)/2(1+\sqrt{-7})/2, so LVL_V acts on 4\mathbf4 by v4=−−7 yv_{\mathbf4}=-\sqrt{-7}\,y and on 4ˉ\bar{\mathbf4} by −v4-v_{\mathbf4}; (c) in the cusp-adapted basis (pe1,e2)(pe_1,e_2), p=3+ωp=3+\omega, the constant is −2ω−3/pˉ-2\omega\sqrt{-3}/\bar p, and the entries Lc∞L_{c\infty}, c≠∞c\ne\infty, are 2−32\sqrt{-3} times the corresponding entries ω/pˉ\omega/\bar p for the trivial local system.

Proof

A stable lattice LL contains ae1⊕ae2\mathfrak ae_1\oplus\mathfrak ae_2 and lies in aZ[ω]2\mathfrak a\Z[\omega]^2, for a={x:(x,0)∈L}\mathfrak a=\{x:(x,0)\in L\}, by applying elementary matrices minus the identity. In the basis (ue1,ve2)(ue_1,ve_2) the ratio s/Bs/B is multiplied by u2vˉ/(v2uˉ)u^2\bar v/(v^2\bar u), which for units is (u/v)3(u/v)^3, equal to 1 exactly when diag(u,v)\mathrm{diag}(u,v) reduces to an inner automorphism of SL⁡(2,7)\SL(2,7). The cochain complex of the triangulation of MM by its 28 tetrahedra is exact over Q(ω)\Q(\omega); all 64 cocycles were restricted to the eight cusps exactly, and the constant yy is the same for all pairs.

Theorem(The outer class preserves the scattering) computed

The rotation D=diag(−1,1)D=\mathrm{diag}(-1,1) acts on the cochains of VV by a cochain map and carries the boundary image of H1(M;V)H^1(M;V) to itself. On the coordinates BB it acts by a signed permutation RDR_D over c↦−cc\mapsto-c, on the coordinates ss by −RD-R_D, and RDΘ=−ΘRDR_D\Theta=-\Theta R_D. So DD exchanges 4\mathbf4 and 4ˉ\bar{\mathbf4} and, read in the conventions it transports, leaves LVL_V and yy unchanged: the sign that distinguishes the quartets belongs to Θ\Theta, and yy is invariant under the outer class.

The mirror cc instead carries LVL_V to its complex conjugate in the same labels, so y↦yˉy\mapsto\bar y. Since vp(y)−vpˉ(y)=−2v_{\mathfrak p}(y)-v_{\bar{\mathfrak p}}(y)=-2, while rescaling the coordinate of every cusp by one η∈Q(ω)×\eta\in\Q(\omega)^\times changes this difference by −3(vp(η)−vpˉ(η))-3(v_{\mathfrak p}(\eta)-v_{\bar{\mathfrak p}}(\eta)) and a real or purely imaginary element has equal valuations, in no Q(ω)\Q(\omega)-rational normalization is yy even or odd under cc.

Proof

DD normalizes Γ(p)\Gamma(\mathfrak p) and intertwines the monodromy of VV with its conjugate by its own matrix; cohomology and restriction to the cusps are natural. The conjugated face pairings lie in Γ(pˉ)\Gamma(\bar{\mathfrak p}), so conjugating the whole exact computation gives the mirror’s. The cochain map, the invariance of the graph for all 64 cocycles, the form of RDR_D and the anticommutation were checked exactly.

Theorem(The spinor system at the cusps) computed

Let T0T_0 be the ideal tetrahedron with cusps ∞\infty, 0, 1 and 1+ω1+\omega, with primitive vectors ξ∞=(1,0)\xi_\infty=(1,0), ξ0=(0,1)\xi_0=(0,1), ξ1=(1,1)\xi_1=(1,1) and ξ1+ω=(1+ω,1)\xi_{1+\omega}=(1+\omega,1), the cusp of (x,y)(x,y) being x/yx/y. The four are pairwise unimodular, and at each cusp the elements uc(t)=I+t ξcξcTJu_c(t)=I+t\,\xi_c\xi_c^{\mathsf T}J, t∈Z[ω]t\in\Z[\omega], J=(01−10)J=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{smallmatrix}\right), are parabolic for t≠0t\ne0 and fix exactly the line of ξc\xi_c. Of the 24 permutations of the cusps of T0T_0 exactly the 12 even ones are induced by Möbius maps, all of them in PSL⁡(2,Z[ω])\PSL(2,\Z[\omega]), and their lifts form the binary tetrahedral group 2T2T; the odd ones are induced only by anti-Möbius maps. Modulo p\mathfrak p, the stabilizer in SL⁡(2,7)\SL(2,7) of the quadruple of T0T_0 and its complement has 48 elements with the element orders of 2O2O; its 24 elements that exchange the quadruple with its complement act on MM without fixed points, since no element of PSL⁡(2,Z[ω])\PSL(2,\Z[\omega]) has order divisible by 4.

(a) The line of ξc\xi_c is the unique line of VV fixed by the parabolic stabilizer of cc. (b) Reduction modulo p\mathfrak p maps the stabilizer of T0T_0 in SL⁡(2,Z[ω])\SL(2,\Z[\omega]) isomorphically onto the even part 2T2T of 2O2O, and there either of the two faithful two-dimensional representations ρ±\rho_\pm of 2O2O is equivalent to VV; the stabilizer permutes the four cusp lines as it permutes the cusps. (c) The odd part of 2O2O acts on VV only by transport between fibers, and VV does not choose between ρ+\rho_+ and ρ−\rho_-, which agree on 2T2T and differ by 2↦−2\sqrt2\mapsto-\sqrt2 on the elements of order 8. (d) The cusp lines transform as VV and not as Vˉ\bar V, and in the mirror link complement Mˉ\bar M they transform as Vˉ\bar V.

Proof

(a) ξcξcTJ\xi_c\xi_c^{\mathsf T}J has rank one and trace ξcTJξc=0\xi_c^{\mathsf T}J\xi_c=0, so uc(t)u_c(t) has determinant 1 and trace 2, and its fixed line is the kernel, the line of ξc\xi_c. (c) An elliptic element of PSL⁡(2,Z[ω])\PSL(2,\Z[\omega]) of order nn has a lift of trace ±2cos⁡(πk/n)\pm2\cos(\pi k/n) in Z[ω]\Z[\omega], real and so in Z\Z, whence n≤3n\le3; an element of order 4 of PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) with a fixed point on MM would lift to one of order divisible by 4. (d) The map from lines to cusps is equivariant for ψ↦gψ\psi\mapsto g\psi and not for ψ↦gˉψ\psi\mapsto\bar g\psi: for g=(1ω01)g=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&\omega\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}\right) the line gξ0g\xi_0 is the cusp ω=g⋅0\omega=g\cdot0, while gˉξ0\bar g\xi_0 is the cusp ωˉ\bar\omega; and V≇VˉV\not\cong\bar V, since (1ω11+ω)\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&\omega\\1&1+\omega\end{smallmatrix}\right) has trace 2+ω≠2+ω‾2+\omega\neq\overline{2+\omega}. The groups, traces and element orders were enumerated exactly.

Proposition(The moves are proper) computed

Give the Hermitian 2×22\times2 matrices the Lorentz form with ⟨A,A⟩=det⁡A\langle A,A\rangle=\det A, and put Nc=ξcξc†N_c=\xi_c\xi_c^\dagger, null vectors with ⟨Na,Nb⟩=12\langle N_a,N_b\rangle=\tfrac12 for a≠ba\ne b that form a Z\Z-basis of Herm2(Z[ω])\mathrm{Herm}_2(\Z[\omega]). The six pairs of cusps of T0T_0 give the six vectors Tab=Na+NbT_{ab}=N_a+N_b, each a unit timelike vector, with ⟨Tab,Tac⟩=32\langle T_{ab},T_{ac}\rangle=\tfrac32 and ⟨Tab,Tcd⟩=2\langle T_{ab},T_{cd}\rangle=2 when {a,b,c,d}\{a,b,c,d\} are the four cusps. Each of the 24 ordered moves {c,a}→{c,b}\{c,a\}\to\{c,b\} is realized, Tcb=gTcag†T_{cb}=gT_{ca}g^\dagger, by a parabolic element fixing ξc\xi_c that carries ξa\xi_a to a unit multiple of ξb\xi_b, and each of the 6 ordered moves {a,b}→{c,d}\{a,b\}\to\{c,d\} by an element of order 4 of 2T2T. All are holomorphic, so each preserves the class of VV. The reflections of T0T_0 also carry pairs to pairs, and they are anti-Möbius.

Proposition(Bilinears of one hand) computed

For G=SL⁡(2,Z[ω])G=\SL(2,\Z[\omega]), dim⁡(V⊗V)G=1\dim(V\otimes V)^G=1, spanned by ε\varepsilon, dim⁡(V⊗Vˉ)G=0\dim(V\otimes\bar V)^G=0 and dim⁡(Vˉ⊗Vˉ)G=1\dim(\bar V\otimes\bar V)^G=1; hence HomG(V,Vˉ)=0\mathrm{Hom}_G(V,\bar V)=0. No positive inner product on VV is GG-invariant, since (1101)\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}\right) is a nontrivial Jordan block. In a fermionic Fock space over a finite-dimensional space with a positive inner product, holes transform by (g−1)T(g^{-1})^{\mathsf T}, which for g∈SL⁡(2,C)g\in\SL(2,\C) is εgε−1\varepsilon g\varepsilon^{-1}: the holes of VV carry VV again, not Vˉ\bar V, whatever positive inner product is used. Holes carry Vˉ\bar V only on a one-particle space carrying a unitary representation of the Lorentz group in which the spinor transforms as VV, and such a representation is infinite-dimensional, as in Wigner’s classification.

Proof

V⊗V=Sym2V⊕Λ2VV\otimes V=\mathrm{Sym}^2V\oplus\Lambda^2V, and only Λ2V\Lambda^2V is invariant. Since V∗≅VV^*\cong V, (V⊗Vˉ)G=HomG(V,Vˉ)(V\otimes\bar V)^G=\mathrm{Hom}_G(V,\bar V), which is zero because V≇VˉV\not\cong\bar V. The second quantization of gg conjugates the annihilation operator a(f)a(f) to a(g−†f)a(g^{-\dagger}f), and f↦a(f)Ωf\mapsto a(f)\Omega is antilinear. Checked exactly over Q(ω)\Q(\omega) on the four elementary generators, and on a Fock space of dimension 256.

Theorem(Two unitary representations) computed

VV carries no GG-invariant positive form, but the vectors that the moves pass between do. For a positive TT of determinant one put ⟨ξ,η⟩T=ξ†T−1η\langle\xi,\eta\rangle_T=\xi^\dagger T^{-1}\eta; every g∈SL⁡(2,C)g\in\SL(2,\C) is an isometry from (V,⟨ ,⟩T)(V,\langle\,,\rangle_T) to (V,⟨ ,⟩gTg†)(V,\langle\,,\rangle_{gTg^\dagger}), and every move of T0T_0 is an isometry of these forms.

(1) On ℓ2(G⋅T0)⊗V\ell^2(G\cdot T_0)\otimes V with ⟨ψ,ϕ⟩=∑Tψ(T)†T−1ϕ(T)\langle\psi,\phi\rangle=\sum_T\psi(T)^\dagger T^{-1}\phi(T) the action (gψ)(T)=g ψ(g−1Tg−†)(g\psi)(T)=g\,\psi(g^{-1}Tg^{-\dagger}) is unitary: it is Ind⁡GT0GV\operatorname{Ind}_{G_{T_0}}^{G}V, and on L2(H3)⊗VL^2(\mathbb H^3)\otimes V the same formula, with the invariant measure, gives the unitary representation of SL⁡(2,C)\SL(2,\C) induced from SU(2)\mathrm{SU}(2). (2) On functions on the cusps with values in the cusp lines, each cusp’s vector taken primitive in Z[ω]2\Z[\omega]^2, GG acts unitarily, by the character of each cusp’s stabilizer on its vector: χ\chi for VV and χˉ≠χ\bar\chi\ne\chi for Vˉ\bar V. On the four cusp lines of T0T_0 a hole relative to the full Fock state carries the conjugate character. (3) Every gTg†gTg^\dagger is positive and every gξξ†g†g\xi\xi^\dagger g^\dagger positive semidefinite: neither space contains vectors of the opposite sign.

Proof

(1) The moves are isometries, and induction from a unitary representation of the stabilizer is unitary. (2) GG carries primitive vectors to unit multiples of primitive vectors, units have modulus one, and diag(ω,ω2)\mathrm{diag}(\omega,\omega^2) acts on ξ∞\xi_\infty by ω\omega, a non-real unit. (3) Positivity is preserved by congruence. The finite statements were checked exactly over Q(ω)\Q(\omega).

Theorem(The ramified prime blocks the reflection)

GG acts on Λ=Herm2(Z[ω])\Lambda=\mathrm{Herm}_2(\Z[\omega]) by X↦gXg†X\mapsto gXg^\dagger, preserving det⁡X\det X and the cone of positive XX; in the continuum every vector with det⁡X<0\det X<0 is carried to −X-X by some element of SL⁡(2,C)\SL(2,\C). Let X∈ΛX\in\Lambda have det⁡X<0\det X<0 and 3∣det⁡X3\mid\det X, and suppose X≢0X\not\equiv0 modulo π=1−ω\pi=1-\omega. Then XX modulo π\pi is a symmetric form of rank one over F3\F_3, λ ℓℓT\lambda\,\ell\ell^{\mathsf T}, and the Legendre symbol (λ3)\bigl(\tfrac{\lambda}{3}\bigr) is invariant under X↦gXg†X\mapsto gXg^\dagger for every g∈GL⁡(2,Z[ω])g\in\GL(2,\Z[\omega]), and under X↦XTX\mapsto X^{\mathsf T}. Since (−13)=−1\bigl(\tfrac{-1}{3}\bigr)=-1, no such map sends XX to −X-X.

Proof

Since ω≡ωˉ≡1\omega\equiv\bar\omega\equiv1 modulo π\pi, reduction turns gXg†gXg^\dagger into gˉXgˉT\bar gX\bar g^{\mathsf T} over F3\F_3, and λ ℓℓT↦λ (gˉℓ)(gˉℓ)T\lambda\,\ell\ell^{\mathsf T}\mapsto\lambda\,(\bar g\ell)(\bar g\ell)^{\mathsf T}. The coefficient λ\lambda is defined up to squares, and the reduction of XTX^{\mathsf T} is the same form.

Proposition(What GG reverses) computed

In the box ∣x1∣,∣x2∣≤2|x_1|,|x_2|\le2, z=u+vωz=u+v\omega with ∣u∣,∣v∣≤2|u|,|v|\le2, the elements of SL⁡(2,Z[ω])\SL(2,\Z[\omega]) with entry coordinates in [−2,2][-2,2] reverse 276 of the 474 primitive vectors with det⁡X<0\det X<0, and those of unit-determinant GL⁡(2,Z[ω])\GL(2,\Z[\omega]) reverse 322. The unreversed are the 148 covered by the theorem above and 4 of determinant −11-11. At a prime that is not ramified there is no invariant of this kind, since at an inert prime every scalar of the residue field is a norm from its quadratic extension and at a split prime the two factors scale independently; so the four are presumably reversed by larger elements, which were not searched. No element reverses a vector with det⁡X>0\det X>0.

Proposition(The quartets restricted to one clock) computed

SL⁡(2,7)\SL(2,7) has no two-dimensional irreducible representation. The group 2O2O has eight classes, of sizes 1,1,6,6,6,8,8,12, and its irreducible characters 1, 1′1', 2\mathbf2, 3\mathbf3, 3′\mathbf3', E+E_+, E−E_- and 4s\mathbf4_s are all obtained from restrictions, with E±=ρ±E_\pm=\rho_\pm. The quartets 4\mathbf4 and 4ˉ\bar{\mathbf4} both restrict to 4s=E+⊗2=E−⊗2\mathbf4_s=E_+\otimes\mathbf2=E_-\otimes\mathbf2, and E+⊗E+=1+3E_+\otimes E_+=1+\mathbf3.

So no quartet has a doublet summand, and the two quartets restrict to the same irreducible. The one doublet with the pattern 2⊗2=1⊕3\mathbf2\otimes\mathbf2=\mathbf1\oplus\mathbf3 inside a quartet’s restriction is EE, a tensor factor shared by 4\mathbf4 and 4ˉ\bar{\mathbf4}; the faithful doublets E±E_\pm occur only in 6s\mathbf6_s, 6s′\mathbf6_s' and 8s\mathbf8_s. Around a cusp the parabolic element (1101)\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}\right), of order 7, acts on 4\mathbf4 with eigenvalues ζk\zeta^k, k∈{0,1,2,4}k\in\{0,1,2,4\}, and on 4ˉ\bar{\mathbf4} with k∈{0,3,5,6}k\in\{0,3,5,6\}: one fixed line, together with the quadratic residues, respectively the non-residues.

Proof

The eight class functions are virtual characters, being integer combinations of restrictions and the sign; their Gram matrix is the identity and their degrees are positive, so they are the irreducible characters. The restrictions and products were computed by inner products in Q(2)\Q(\sqrt2).

The volume’s word
lift