Universal Kernel

seam system

Which seams do the theories themselves supply?

A family of incarnations with a chosen set of seams among them, loops allowed: typically the natural identifications that the theories provide.

inversiontransvectionrotationone steptangentresidual pointSingerSingerreversal7A7Bvectors ±vflexesflex tangentslabellings, {0,1,3}labellings, {0,4,6}Heawood matchingsCoxeter heptagonsτ: power 4roles d = 0, 1, 3: powers 1, 2, 4coherent
Plate 2.5The natural seams of the object of size 24. Gold: the two seams between the flexes and their tangents, and the three role seams; blue: the coherent cycle through the cyclic labellings.
Definition(Seam system, monodromy)

A seam system for an object XX is a family of incarnations of XX together with a set EE of seams between members of the family; a seam from an incarnation to itself is allowed. A cycle is a closed walk γ=(s1ϵ1,…,smϵm)\gamma=(s_1^{\epsilon_1},\dots,s_m^{\epsilon_m}) with sk∈Es_k\in E and ϵk=±1\epsilon_k=\pm1, starting and ending at one incarnation.

For a non-rigid object any automorphism is the monodromy of some cycle, so the notion has content only for seams given by the theories rather than chosen. Such seams are called natural, without formalizing the word, and for each one the construction that defines it is recorded.

Proposition(Natural seams)

On the object of size 24 the following maps are seams.

(1) Inversion 7A→7B7A\to7B, y↦y−1y\mapsto y^{-1}.

(2) Transvection: a vector ±v\pm v of F72\F_7^2 goes to the transvection w↦w+det⁡(v,w) vw\mapsto w+\det(v,w)\,v. It maps onto 7A7A, sending ±(1,0)\pm(1,0) to g ⁣:z↦z+1g\colon z\mapsto z+1.

(3) Rotation: a flex PP of the Klein quartic goes to the element of its stabilizer that acts on the tangent line TPXT_PX by ζ=e2πi/7\zeta=e^{2\pi i/7}. It maps onto 7A7A.

(4) Tangent: a flex goes to its tangent line. Residual point: a flex tangent meets the quartic at its flex with multiplicity 3 and at exactly one other point, again a flex, and the tangent goes to that point.

(5) Singer: a cyclic labelling ℓ\ell of the Fano plane goes to the collineation ℓ−1∘(x↦x+1)∘ℓ\ell^{-1}\circ(x\mapsto x+1)\circ\ell. For the marking fixed in the book the labellings for {0,1,3}\{0,1,3\} go onto 7B7B and those for {0,4,6}\{0,4,6\} onto 7A7A. Reversal, ℓ↦−ℓ\ell\mapsto-\ell, goes from the first kind to the second.

(6) Roles: for d∈{0,1,3}d\in\{0,1,3\}, a labelling ℓ\ell for {0,1,3}\{0,1,3\} goes to the perfect matching of the Heawood graph that joins each point vv to the line in which vv plays the role dd, namely ℓ−1(ℓ(v)−d+{0,1,3})\ell^{-1}(\ell(v)-d+\{0,1,3\}).

(7) One step: a heptagon of the Coxeter graph goes to the element of 7A7A that rotates it by one step.

Proof

Each map is defined by the structure of its theory alone, so it commutes with the group of the theory; it is therefore a GG-map, and a GG-map between transitive GG-sets of the same size is a bijection. For (2), det⁡(hv,hw)=det⁡(v,w)\det(hv,hw)=\det(v,w) for h∈SL⁡(2,7)h\in\SL(2,7). For (3), ρ(g)=diag(ζ4,ζ2,ζ)\rho(g)=\mathrm{diag}(\zeta^4,\zeta^2,\zeta) fixes the flexes (1:0:0)(1:0:0), (0:1:0)(0:1:0), (0:0:1)(0:0:1), and near (0:0:1)(0:0:1), in the chart z=1z=1, it multiplies the local coordinate yy by ζ\zeta. For (4), at (1:0:0)(1:0:0) the tangent is y=0y=0, which meets the quartic where z3x=0z^3x=0: at (1:0:0)(1:0:0) three times and at (0:0:1)(0:0:1) once. The classes in (5) and the statement (7) were found by machine.

Example

The incarnations of the object of size 24: the classes 7A7A and 7B7B of elements of order 7, of 24 elements each; the 24 nonzero vectors of F72\F_7^2 up to sign; the 24 flexes and the 24 flex tangents of the Klein quartic; the cyclic labellings of the Fano plane modulo translation, for {0,1,3}\{0,1,3\} and for {0,4,6}\{0,4,6\}; the 24 perfect matchings of the Heawood graph; the 24 heptagons of the Coxeter graph; and, from the literature, the 24 faces of Klein’s map of type {7,3}\{7,3\} and the 24 cusps of the modular curve X(7)X(7).

Remark(Seam systems as connections)

A seam system over a graph is a lattice gauge connection in disguise, with the stabilizer principle supplying the gauge group: a choice of alignments turns its seams into link variables in NG(H)/HN_G(H)/H, and its monodromy into holonomy. Seam systems also reach beyond the group of order 168: over its double cover, on the object of size 112, a cycle whose monodromy below is the exchange of two points has monodromy of order 4, whose square is −I-I.

Theorem(Mixed squares) computed

On each of the two trees at 7, the Bianchi group’s and Mumford’s, the link Lk(x)\mathrm{Lk}(x) of a vertex is an incarnation of the projective line over F7\F_7. Let KxK_x be the elements of the vertex group of xx that act trivially on Lk(x)\mathrm{Lk}(x). For a step x→yx\to y the mixed-square group M(x→y)M(x\to y) is the image of KxK_x on Lk(y)\mathrm{Lk}(y): the holonomy of a square made of a loop at xx that xx cannot see, followed by the step.

(1) On Mumford’s tree, the kernel of Γ1\Gamma_1 on the link of Λ0\Lambda_0, of order 98, acts on the link of each neighbour through a dihedral group of order 14: seven translations and seven involutions outside PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), one of them the central element of Sp(N)\mathrm{Sp}(N). (2) On the Bianchi group’s tree, the kernel of PSL⁡(2,Z/49)\PSL(2,\Z/49) on the link acts on the new neighbours of each neighbour through a cyclic group of order 7, by even permutations.

Proof

By direct computation on the balls of radius two.

Theorem(The object of the points on the two trees) computed

Let X7X_7 be the object of size 7 with stabilizer S4aS_4^a, the points of the Fano plane together with its lines, and X7′X_7' the object with stabilizer S4bS_4^b; both are rigid, and the outer automorphism exchanges them. Place at each vertex of a tree an incarnation of X7X_7, and carry it across each step.

(1) On the Bianchi group’s tree the seam system is forced: every mixed square twists the incarnation by an element of PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), the twisted incarnation is again one of X7X_7, and since X7X_7 is rigid it is joined to the untwisted one by exactly one seam. So the seam system exists and is unique; its gauge group N(S4a)/S4aN(S_4^a)/S_4^a is trivial, and the squares act by automorphisms of GG that are inner. (2) On Mumford’s tree there is none: the central element of Sp(N)\mathrm{Sp}(N) twists the incarnation at the next vertex by an involution outside PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), which carries the seven groups S4aS_4^a onto the seven groups S4bS_4^b and the octonion table x+{0,1,3}x+\{0,1,3\} onto its mirror x+{0,4,6}x+\{0,4,6\}; the twisted incarnation is one of X7′X_7', and no seam joins it to the untwisted one. (3) Along Mumford’s building, at a vertex of the type of Λ0\Lambda_0, every element acts on the link through PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), so the incarnation is carried; along a slice through Klein vertices every move from one Klein vertex to another at distance two acts improperly: the groups S4aS_4^a of the second are the groups S4bS_4^b of the first, and labelled by the Singer cycle one carries the table and the other its mirror.

Proof

(1) The mixed squares act by even permutations, and a rigid object has exactly one seam between any two incarnations. (2) The exchange of the two classes of S4S_4 under an improper element is classical and was checked, and the exchange of the table and its mirror agrees with the action of improper elements on the two families of algebras. (3) Every move between Klein vertices at distance two is odd, and the statements of (2) were computed for such a move; the vertex group at the type of Λ0\Lambda_0 acts on its link through PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7).

Lemma(Arrows on a tree)

A choice of one parent for each vertex is the remaining datum of a seam system along a tree. Let every vertex of a locally finite infinite tree choose one neighbour, its parent, so that every edge is chosen by at least one of its endpoints. Then either exactly one edge is chosen by both of its endpoints, and every path of parents ends by oscillating on that edge, or no edge is, and all paths of parents run to one common end. The symmetries of the choice fix that edge, or that end; so no such choice is invariant under a group that fixes no vertex, edge or end, and none is invariant under either parent.

Proof

Two edges chosen from both ends cannot occur: on the geodesic between them the inner vertices are one fewer than the edges, and the outer endpoints choose their partners off the geodesic, so some edge of the geodesic would be chosen by nobody. Along the geodesic between two vertices no inner vertex chooses both of its geodesic neighbours, so the choices point inward to one vertex of the geodesic, and the two paths of parents meet there and continue together.

Built from
seamincarnation